Our tolerance for inequitable food systems is growing, even in wealthy countries. There is still time to reverse course, but only if policymakers collaborate with civil-society organizations to support community-led food initiatives and to ensure that marginalized groups are included in decision-making at all levels.
BRIGHTON – From the 1960s until the mid-2010s, hunger was on the decline around the world. But, despite record food production, the trend is reversing, with around 828 million people affected by hunger globally in 2021 – an increase of 46 million from 2020 and 150 million from 2019.
The problem is not confined to low-income countries. Large numbers of people in wealthier countries like the United Kingdom, South Africa, and Brazil are unable to meet their basic nutritional needs. Our recent research suggests that inequitable food systems and widespread hunger could become the new normal.
In Brazil, poverty and food insecurity had fallen to their lowest levels by the early 2010s. But much of this progress has been reversed in recent years, owing to a recession that began in 2014 and deepened in 2015. The economic crisis coincided with, and was amplified by, a period of political turmoil, resulting in the impeachment of former President Dilma Rousseff in 2016.
When former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro took office in 2019, his government made no effort to reduce hunger or poverty, and the COVID-19 pandemic soon exacerbated both. By 2022, an estimated 125 million Brazilians – more than half of the population – faced some degree of food insecurity, with 33 million living in hunger. Black and brown communities, women-led households, and low-income families with young children are disproportionately affected.
As in Brazil, hunger in South Africa, where I grew up, is rooted in historical legacies, and food insecurity persists despite the constitution’s explicit recognition of people’s right to adequate nutrition. Nearly 45% of the population experienced moderate or extreme food insecurity between 2018 and 2020 – twice as many as in Brazil during that period.
Access every new PS commentary, our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – including Longer Reads, Insider Interviews, Big Picture/Big Question, and Say More – and the full PS archive.
Subscribe Now
We produce more than enough food to feed the world’s population. So, what is going wrong, and how can it be fixed?
The first problem is that governments remain unwilling to act. In the UK, there is a lack of political will to address deepening inequalities, and the country’s inadequate welfare system has forced food banks and charities to pick up the slack. That will change only when rising levels of hunger start to cost politicians votes.
In South Africa, civil-society organizations and the media are working to raise awareness about food insecurity and hold the government to account. Since March 2022, for example, the online newspaper Daily Maverick has published a series of articles about hunger in South Africa under the title “Food Justice.” Many NGOs in the country, like Gift of the Givers, provide food to those in need, while other groups pressure the government to deliver on its mandate to ensure the right to food. Such efforts certainly point in the right direction, but much more needs to be done.
The second problem is a familiar one worldwide: victim blaming, like the UK politicians who claim that people use food banks because they cannot cook or manage their household budget. This is as inaccurate as it is unproductive: structural disparities and power imbalances, not individual choices, are driving food insecurity, hitting small-scale farmers, marginalized groups, and women the hardest.
To overcome the underlying systemic hunger and poverty, the people most vulnerable to food insecurity must be at the center of efforts to create more equitable food systems that improve both their access to nutrition and their livelihoods. That means supporting community-led initiatives that are designed with marginalized groups’ needs in mind. It will also be critical to develop local and national policies that target historical inequities and to ensure that those suffering from hunger are included in decision-making at all levels.
The UK city of Brighton and Hove offers a good example of how community groups and government officials can work together to address hunger and poverty. By using a “whole-system” approach, whereby different departments of the local government (including health, planning, and transportation) collaborated with school kitchens and community organizations, the city was able to improve access to healthy food and reduce childhood-obesity rates. Moreover, successive food and food-poverty strategies since 2006 have enabled stakeholders to identify relevant issues and adapt programs as needed. This long-term vision, coupled with a cross-sectoral approach that is not limited to food organizations, has been key to the city’s success.
Ultimately, coordinated action is fundamental to creating more equitable outcomes. We need to question how food systems function and who benefits the most from them. Researchers, activists, and charities must work with local, national, and global leaders to correct the structural shortcomings in the production, processing, distribution, and consumption of food.
In a world that produces enough food for everyone, we should never accept hunger as an immutable fact of life. No one should worry about where their next meal is coming from, or if it’s coming at all.
To have unlimited access to our content including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, PS OnPoint and PS The Big Picture, please subscribe
Donald Trump and Elon Musk's reign of disruption is crippling research universities’ ability to serve as productive partners in innovation, thus threatening the very system that they purport to celebrate. The Chinese, who are increasingly becoming frontier innovators in their own right, will be forever grateful.
warns that the pillars of US dynamism and competitiveness are being systematically toppled.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s defense of President Donald Trump’s trade tariffs as a step toward “rebalancing” the US economy misses the point. While some economies, like China and Germany, need to increase domestic spending, the US needs to increase national saving.
thinks US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is neglecting the need for spending cuts in major federal programs.
BRIGHTON – From the 1960s until the mid-2010s, hunger was on the decline around the world. But, despite record food production, the trend is reversing, with around 828 million people affected by hunger globally in 2021 – an increase of 46 million from 2020 and 150 million from 2019.
The problem is not confined to low-income countries. Large numbers of people in wealthier countries like the United Kingdom, South Africa, and Brazil are unable to meet their basic nutritional needs. Our recent research suggests that inequitable food systems and widespread hunger could become the new normal.
In the UK, the world’s sixth-largest economy, roughly one in seven people experienced food poverty in September 2022, with more than 2,000 food banks operating across the country; there were fewer than 100 a decade or so ago.
In Brazil, poverty and food insecurity had fallen to their lowest levels by the early 2010s. But much of this progress has been reversed in recent years, owing to a recession that began in 2014 and deepened in 2015. The economic crisis coincided with, and was amplified by, a period of political turmoil, resulting in the impeachment of former President Dilma Rousseff in 2016.
When former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro took office in 2019, his government made no effort to reduce hunger or poverty, and the COVID-19 pandemic soon exacerbated both. By 2022, an estimated 125 million Brazilians – more than half of the population – faced some degree of food insecurity, with 33 million living in hunger. Black and brown communities, women-led households, and low-income families with young children are disproportionately affected.
As in Brazil, hunger in South Africa, where I grew up, is rooted in historical legacies, and food insecurity persists despite the constitution’s explicit recognition of people’s right to adequate nutrition. Nearly 45% of the population experienced moderate or extreme food insecurity between 2018 and 2020 – twice as many as in Brazil during that period.
Introductory Offer: Save 30% on PS Digital
Access every new PS commentary, our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – including Longer Reads, Insider Interviews, Big Picture/Big Question, and Say More – and the full PS archive.
Subscribe Now
We produce more than enough food to feed the world’s population. So, what is going wrong, and how can it be fixed?
The first problem is that governments remain unwilling to act. In the UK, there is a lack of political will to address deepening inequalities, and the country’s inadequate welfare system has forced food banks and charities to pick up the slack. That will change only when rising levels of hunger start to cost politicians votes.
In South Africa, civil-society organizations and the media are working to raise awareness about food insecurity and hold the government to account. Since March 2022, for example, the online newspaper Daily Maverick has published a series of articles about hunger in South Africa under the title “Food Justice.” Many NGOs in the country, like Gift of the Givers, provide food to those in need, while other groups pressure the government to deliver on its mandate to ensure the right to food. Such efforts certainly point in the right direction, but much more needs to be done.
The second problem is a familiar one worldwide: victim blaming, like the UK politicians who claim that people use food banks because they cannot cook or manage their household budget. This is as inaccurate as it is unproductive: structural disparities and power imbalances, not individual choices, are driving food insecurity, hitting small-scale farmers, marginalized groups, and women the hardest.
To overcome the underlying systemic hunger and poverty, the people most vulnerable to food insecurity must be at the center of efforts to create more equitable food systems that improve both their access to nutrition and their livelihoods. That means supporting community-led initiatives that are designed with marginalized groups’ needs in mind. It will also be critical to develop local and national policies that target historical inequities and to ensure that those suffering from hunger are included in decision-making at all levels.
The UK city of Brighton and Hove offers a good example of how community groups and government officials can work together to address hunger and poverty. By using a “whole-system” approach, whereby different departments of the local government (including health, planning, and transportation) collaborated with school kitchens and community organizations, the city was able to improve access to healthy food and reduce childhood-obesity rates. Moreover, successive food and food-poverty strategies since 2006 have enabled stakeholders to identify relevant issues and adapt programs as needed. This long-term vision, coupled with a cross-sectoral approach that is not limited to food organizations, has been key to the city’s success.
Ultimately, coordinated action is fundamental to creating more equitable outcomes. We need to question how food systems function and who benefits the most from them. Researchers, activists, and charities must work with local, national, and global leaders to correct the structural shortcomings in the production, processing, distribution, and consumption of food.
In a world that produces enough food for everyone, we should never accept hunger as an immutable fact of life. No one should worry about where their next meal is coming from, or if it’s coming at all.