To commemorate its founding 25 years ago, PS will be republishing over the coming months a selection of commentaries written since 1994. In the following commentary from 2001, Václav Havel urges Europeans not to close themselves off “in the hope that the various winds of this world will pass them by,” but to engage with the world and assume their share of responsibility for it.
PRAGUE – Identity and sovereignty are often discussed nowadays. But what do they actually mean? Both probably consist of feelings that a community can only be its true self when it can be so without hindrance – in essence, when a community can decide its own fate.
Today’s talk about identity and sovereignty is often rather gloomy. Both are allegedly endangered: by a European Union that wishes to assimilate “us” as much as possible; by the European Commission with its standards; by NATO, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank; by the United Nations; by foreign capital; by Western ideologies; by Eastern mafias; by American influence; by Asian or African immigration; and by God knows what else.
Some of these concerns may contain a rational core. Yet they all derive from a traditional misconception – the belief that upholding character, identity, or sovereignty is not principally the task of a community or a people but is something left in the control of others; that is, left to those who would attempt to deprive “us” of our identity, or at least to weaken it. I do not think, however, that the world’s main concern is to find ways to rob people of their identity and sovereignty. Respect for any country’s unique character, the manner of its development, and the degree to which a community decides its fate, are determined primarily by those living within it.
How is this fate determined? It depends on whether a people close themselves off in the hope that the various winds of this world will pass them by; or whether they take the opposite tack and conduct themselves as true inhabitants of this continent and of this planet, that is, as people who are engaged with the world and assume their share of responsibility for it. All humanity is faced with this crucial dilemma: to silently watch a suicidal self-propulsion of our civilization; or to become active participants in the maintenance of global public assets, including the most precious one of all – our planet and its biosphere – of which we are a part.
But the concept of community is also composed of concrete things. It depends, for example, on whether the environment is nurtured. It depends on whether a people let their cities and towns become marred by a banal universal architecture devoid of creativity and imagination. Such blights are not imposed by the EU or by global capital with its transnational corporations, or by evil foreigners. All of this physical degradation – as it happens – is accomplished with local consent and active local assistance. In other words: those who defile “our” identity are primarily ourselves – we who should be its protectors and guardians.
Who is it that infests language and conversation with clichés, ill-structured syntax, and rote expressions that flow mindlessly from mouth to mouth and pen to pen? Who is responsible for the sterile language of commercials seen on every wall and television – indeed, seen everywhere – without which we appear to be unable to know even the time of day? Aren’t these severe attacks on language also assaults on a root of our identities? And aren’t we who use them, quite willingly, also responsible for them?
Access every new PS commentary, our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – including Longer Reads, Insider Interviews, Big Picture/Big Question, and Say More – and the full PS archive.
Subscribe Now
Let us go farther: who allows young people to bathe from morning till night in blood flowing on television and movie screens, and yet is sanctimonious and astonished about the aggressiveness of the young? Who reads all kinds of trash and porno-trash? These “entertainments” are not filmed and published by bureaucrats from Brussels or by representatives of international institutions, foreign states, or large international corporations: they are marketed by citizens to fellow citizens.
Behind these visible assaults on identity found in every industrial country, the post-communist countries confront other serious threats to both sovereignty and identity. Over the past ten years of economic transformation, unimaginable wealth has unaccountably disappeared from banks and companies; billions in taxes go unpaid. Few of those responsible have been brought to justice. Perhaps worst of all, those who transferred money to tax havens seem to enjoy the silent admiration of the people whom they have taken advantage of.
But who, precisely, are those who do not repay their debts, and who hire assassins to get rid of their creditors? Who, among those who should be serving as models for others – that is, who among the leaders of political parties – denies his own financial machinations with a smirk?
Who emits into our political and public life the poisons of dissension, foul play, egoism, hatred, and envy? Who – quite inconspicuously – is leading us to become ever more hardened in our sensibilities, and toward becoming increasingly accustomed to the fact that everyone can lie about everything and anything?
I repeat: if a country’s identity is jeopardized, it is placed in that position primarily from within; it is placed in jeopardy by choice – often the choices expressed at the ballot box – and out of negligence or indolence. Threats to identity nowadays are primarily not matters of dictates from outside. True, the blind pursuit of profit is not the invention of any one people. True, that pursuit is a trait which is immensely contagious. But it is also true that nobody can force anyone to take that course.
If we really want it, if we all are prepared to express the desire to preserve community and identity by taking part in elections and by making the right choices, an open international environment and the advanced democratic cultures of our neighbors, friends, and allies constitute the best ground for advancing a people’s uniqueness. Nowadays, any identity can truly live and flourish only if it breathes the free air of the world; if it defines itself against a background of lasting and living neighborly relations with other identities; and if it confronts, in a dignified manner, both the adverse winds that blow across today’s world and, perhaps more importantly, the adverse desires that come from within.
To have unlimited access to our content including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, PS OnPoint and PS The Big Picture, please subscribe
World order is a matter of degree: it varies over time, depending on technological, political, social, and ideological factors that can affect the global distribution of power and influence norms. It can be radically altered both by broader historical trends and by a single major power's blunders.
examines the role of evolving power dynamics and norms in bringing about stable arrangements among states.
Donald Trump has left no doubt that he wants to build an authoritarian, illiberal world order based on traditional spheres of influence and agreements with other illiberal leaders. The only role that the European Union plays in his script is an obstacle that must be pushed aside.
warns that the European Union has no place in Donald Trump’s illiberal worldview.
Log in/Register
Please log in or register to continue. Registration is free.
PRAGUE – Identity and sovereignty are often discussed nowadays. But what do they actually mean? Both probably consist of feelings that a community can only be its true self when it can be so without hindrance – in essence, when a community can decide its own fate.
Today’s talk about identity and sovereignty is often rather gloomy. Both are allegedly endangered: by a European Union that wishes to assimilate “us” as much as possible; by the European Commission with its standards; by NATO, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank; by the United Nations; by foreign capital; by Western ideologies; by Eastern mafias; by American influence; by Asian or African immigration; and by God knows what else.
Some of these concerns may contain a rational core. Yet they all derive from a traditional misconception – the belief that upholding character, identity, or sovereignty is not principally the task of a community or a people but is something left in the control of others; that is, left to those who would attempt to deprive “us” of our identity, or at least to weaken it. I do not think, however, that the world’s main concern is to find ways to rob people of their identity and sovereignty. Respect for any country’s unique character, the manner of its development, and the degree to which a community decides its fate, are determined primarily by those living within it.
How is this fate determined? It depends on whether a people close themselves off in the hope that the various winds of this world will pass them by; or whether they take the opposite tack and conduct themselves as true inhabitants of this continent and of this planet, that is, as people who are engaged with the world and assume their share of responsibility for it. All humanity is faced with this crucial dilemma: to silently watch a suicidal self-propulsion of our civilization; or to become active participants in the maintenance of global public assets, including the most precious one of all – our planet and its biosphere – of which we are a part.
But the concept of community is also composed of concrete things. It depends, for example, on whether the environment is nurtured. It depends on whether a people let their cities and towns become marred by a banal universal architecture devoid of creativity and imagination. Such blights are not imposed by the EU or by global capital with its transnational corporations, or by evil foreigners. All of this physical degradation – as it happens – is accomplished with local consent and active local assistance. In other words: those who defile “our” identity are primarily ourselves – we who should be its protectors and guardians.
Who is it that infests language and conversation with clichés, ill-structured syntax, and rote expressions that flow mindlessly from mouth to mouth and pen to pen? Who is responsible for the sterile language of commercials seen on every wall and television – indeed, seen everywhere – without which we appear to be unable to know even the time of day? Aren’t these severe attacks on language also assaults on a root of our identities? And aren’t we who use them, quite willingly, also responsible for them?
Introductory Offer: Save 30% on PS Digital
Access every new PS commentary, our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – including Longer Reads, Insider Interviews, Big Picture/Big Question, and Say More – and the full PS archive.
Subscribe Now
Let us go farther: who allows young people to bathe from morning till night in blood flowing on television and movie screens, and yet is sanctimonious and astonished about the aggressiveness of the young? Who reads all kinds of trash and porno-trash? These “entertainments” are not filmed and published by bureaucrats from Brussels or by representatives of international institutions, foreign states, or large international corporations: they are marketed by citizens to fellow citizens.
Behind these visible assaults on identity found in every industrial country, the post-communist countries confront other serious threats to both sovereignty and identity. Over the past ten years of economic transformation, unimaginable wealth has unaccountably disappeared from banks and companies; billions in taxes go unpaid. Few of those responsible have been brought to justice. Perhaps worst of all, those who transferred money to tax havens seem to enjoy the silent admiration of the people whom they have taken advantage of.
But who, precisely, are those who do not repay their debts, and who hire assassins to get rid of their creditors? Who, among those who should be serving as models for others – that is, who among the leaders of political parties – denies his own financial machinations with a smirk?
Who emits into our political and public life the poisons of dissension, foul play, egoism, hatred, and envy? Who – quite inconspicuously – is leading us to become ever more hardened in our sensibilities, and toward becoming increasingly accustomed to the fact that everyone can lie about everything and anything?
I repeat: if a country’s identity is jeopardized, it is placed in that position primarily from within; it is placed in jeopardy by choice – often the choices expressed at the ballot box – and out of negligence or indolence. Threats to identity nowadays are primarily not matters of dictates from outside. True, the blind pursuit of profit is not the invention of any one people. True, that pursuit is a trait which is immensely contagious. But it is also true that nobody can force anyone to take that course.
If we really want it, if we all are prepared to express the desire to preserve community and identity by taking part in elections and by making the right choices, an open international environment and the advanced democratic cultures of our neighbors, friends, and allies constitute the best ground for advancing a people’s uniqueness. Nowadays, any identity can truly live and flourish only if it breathes the free air of the world; if it defines itself against a background of lasting and living neighborly relations with other identities; and if it confronts, in a dignified manner, both the adverse winds that blow across today’s world and, perhaps more importantly, the adverse desires that come from within.
Read more from our "Havel Lives" Focal Point.